Page 1 of 2 12>
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#196972 - 01/07/19 04:21 PM S&W 69 or 629 Mountain gun? Anyone have both?
WARDOG
stranger


Registered: 12/29/18
Posts: 10
Loc: Elk City, Idaho

Offline
I am considering replacing my .44 629 mountain gun with the smaller model .44 69 . The mountain gun is backup to my BFR .500 JRH.
Does anyone have / had both revolvers to give feedback on the 69? I'm not getting any younger and the lighter / smaller 69 may be worth it.
Shooting full house mag loads? My go-to load is the Buff Bore 305's.
Barrell length?
Any input would be appreciated.

- RENO

Top
#197023 - 01/09/19 03:47 PM Re: S&W 69 or 629 Mountain gun? Anyone have both? [Re: WARDOG]
H2OBUG
Pooh-Bah


Registered: 02/13/08
Posts: 2112
Loc: Louisiana

Offline
629 is an N Frame with 6 Shots
69 is an L frame with 5 Shots

I would expect the 629 to be a bit more robust.

They use to call the 69 the 696 and it was 44 spl only.

If you want small and lighter you might look at the 329 --but be careful what you ask for that sucker kicks.

May want to look closely at the older 396 super light and really compact but it is a 44 SPL.

If you decide to sell the 629 MG let me know I may be a buyer.


Edited by H2OBUG (01/09/19 03:48 PM)
_________________________
If it jams force it! If it breaks it needed replacing anyway.

Top
#197024 - 01/09/19 05:16 PM Re: S&W 69 or 629 Mountain gun? Anyone have both? [Re: H2OBUG]
Jeff460
member


Registered: 12/01/17
Posts: 199
Loc: Kansas

Offline
May I recommend the set-up I am working on right now? I have purchased a Model 329 Smith and Wesson and have got an aftermarket Smith and Wesson stainless steel 629 cylinder to use on it. The 329 PD is light at 26 ounces with a titanium six-shot cylinder. The titanium cylinder is light and strong but high velocity loads can cause erosion of the titanium. So I put the Model 629 stainless cylinder on my 329. It adds about 4 ounces, bringing the empty gun weight to 30 ounces. I also put on an X-frame Hogue grip that has the pad in the grip to reduce felt recoil.
So that is where I am at. Mag-Na-Porting will come next with dual trapezoidal EDM cut ports at the front area of the four inch barrel. It will be my EDC revolver in a custom shoulder holster.
The big advantage of the Model 329 over the Model 69? The Model 69 only has 5 shots and the Model 329 PD has 6 shots. And one more thing. The frame size where the forcing cone is supported is larger on the N-frame Model 329 PD. The force of the bullet entering the forcing cone could be better handled with the larger area of mass of the N frame on the Model 329 PD.



Edited by Jeff460 (01/10/19 10:03 AM)
Edit Reason: Added more information.

Top
#197027 - 01/09/19 08:00 PM Re: S&W 69 or 629 Mountain gun? Anyone have both? [Re: Jeff460]
Brenden
enthusiast


Registered: 10/21/12
Posts: 386
Loc: WV

Offline
I love my model 69 4". I usually shoot 240's through it though. It becomes a handful with heavy bullets and lots of powder. I've only put around 200 rounds through mine, but I don't see it giving up the ghost anytime soon. It's a packable and very accurate gun.

Top
#197039 - 01/10/19 11:27 AM Re: S&W 69 or 629 Mountain gun? Anyone have both? [Re: Brenden]
WARDOG
stranger


Registered: 12/29/18
Posts: 10
Loc: Elk City, Idaho

Offline
I received quite a bit of feedback on the 'single-actions board so I picked up the model 69 yesterday. I went with the 4" version. I also bought several boxes of different factory ammo, different weights, velocities etc. for testing.

jeff460 - I handled a 329 PD yesterday. S&W found a hokie solution for the flame cutting issue. There is now a thin strip of stainless(?) inside the cylinder window from the bottom of the top strap and the top of the forcing cone. It is held in place by the front screw of the rear sight mount.
Thanks for the replies.

Top
#197043 - 01/10/19 02:23 PM Re: S&W 69 or 629 Mountain gun? Anyone have both? [Re: WARDOG]
Jeff460
member


Registered: 12/01/17
Posts: 199
Loc: Kansas

Offline
It is a solution and that is not what I was referring to that erodes. The titanium cylinder throws off sparks and erodes over time. The stainless cylinder is more durable and needs no extra finish to handle what has always been used as well in the Model 629.
Even Smith and Wesson has fitted a stainless cylinder to the Backpacker 329 version that was a special run for Alaska clients. The Alaska Backpacker model.
Good luck with that slick Model 69 five shot. I am sure it will serve you well. Get a speed loader and be ready for quick reloads as needed. Or send it to TK Custom for a moon clip set-up. Moon clips are faster to reload and faster to eject and TK Custom will set you up. Just an idea.

Top
#197056 - 01/11/19 11:58 AM Re: S&W 69 or 629 Mountain gun? Anyone have both? [Re: Jeff460]
Whitworth
Shootist


Registered: 01/15/09
Posts: 9546
Loc: Virginia

content Online
 Originally Posted By: Jeff460
May I recommend the set-up I am working on right now? I have purchased a Model 329 Smith and Wesson and have got an aftermarket Smith and Wesson stainless steel 629 cylinder to use on it. The 329 PD is light at 26 ounces with a titanium six-shot cylinder. The titanium cylinder is light and strong but high velocity loads can cause erosion of the titanium. So I put the Model 629 stainless cylinder on my 329. It adds about 4 ounces, bringing the empty gun weight to 30 ounces. I also put on an X-frame Hogue grip that has the pad in the grip to reduce felt recoil.
So that is where I am at. Mag-Na-Porting will come next with dual trapezoidal EDM cut ports at the front area of the four inch barrel. It will be my EDC revolver in a custom shoulder holster.
The big advantage of the Model 329 over the Model 69? The Model 69 only has 5 shots and the Model 329 PD has 6 shots. And one more thing. The frame size where the forcing cone is supported is larger on the N-frame Model 329 PD. The force of the bullet entering the forcing cone could be better handled with the larger area of mass of the N frame on the Model 329 PD.



Jeff, do you have a photo of it? I would love to see it.
_________________________
Max Prasac

Semper Fidelis

Bovine Bullet Test https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmtZky8T7-k&t=35s

Gun Digest TV's Modern Shooter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGo-KMpXPpA&t=7s


Top
#197057 - 01/11/19 02:48 PM Re: S&W 69 or 629 Mountain gun? Anyone have both? [Re: Whitworth]
Jeff460
member


Registered: 12/01/17
Posts: 199
Loc: Kansas

Offline
I will take a picture with my phone and get it posted. Thanks for the interest. Should I wait till I get the Mag-Na-Porting completed or just get the picture with the Hogue X-frame grips and the stainless-steel 629 cylinder replacement in place?

Top
#197058 - 01/11/19 06:36 PM Re: S&W 69 or 629 Mountain gun? Anyone have both? [Re: Jeff460]
WARDOG
stranger


Registered: 12/29/18
Posts: 10
Loc: Elk City, Idaho

Offline
I would like to see pics of your 329 mod as well.
I shot the 69 yesterday with three different loads.
Hornady 240 grn. XTP, 1350 fps : Easy shooting. Felt like I was shooting .45 acp
Hornady 300 grn. XTP, 1150 fps : What I was expecting. A heavy hollow point with an acceptable amount of recoil. Decently priced at $22 for 20.
Buffalo Bore 305 grn. LBT - LFN, 1325 fps : This load was punishing (as it is even in my 629 Mtn. gun). It was the most accurate of the three tested at 25 yards, however on the expensive side at $36 for 20.
Velocities were 'as advertised' on the box and not verified by Chrony.
My initial experience was favorable. The 69 shot much like the Mountain Gun with a few differences. Although there is a 7 oz difference between the two, the 69 felt like the same weight as the 629 MG shooting free hand. The 69 feels smaller in size and has than 686 feel I am accustomed to. Also the lower bore height of the 69 is noticeable especially during recoil of the Hornady 300 grainers.
The factory trigger on the 69 has a lot to be desired, as I am a bit of a trigger snob. Single action mode was acceptable, however DAO was not. I was comparing it to my circa 1981 S&W 686 trigger but I probably shouldn't.
I don't yet have an opinion regarding carrying the 69 in a holster. Apparently S&W 69 holsters are uncommon in the cookie cutter holster market. The extra .25" barrel length prevents other L framed holsters from performing double duty.

Top
#197060 - 01/11/19 08:23 PM Re: S&W 69 or 629 Mountain gun? Anyone have both? [Re: WARDOG]
Brenden
enthusiast


Registered: 10/21/12
Posts: 386
Loc: WV

Offline
I carry my model 69 on the farm and as my daily CC weapon. I use a simply rugged pancake and it works well. Tuck it in my waist for socializing, and on my hip while on the farm. It's a very versatile weapon.

Top
Page 1 of 2 12>


Moderator:  Gary, jamesfromjersey, Chance Weldon, Gregg Richter 
Hop to:
 Portal Sidebar
Who's Online
3 registered (Franchise, longhunter, 1 invisible) and 73 anonymous users online.
Top Posters
9608
s4s4u
9546
Whitworth
9016
jamesfromjersey
7643
wapitirod
7327
TCTex.
6464
KRal
5088
Ernie
5056
Gary
4704
Tigger
4461
pab1
4370
Dan B.
4243
Franchise
4243
Chance Weldon
4104
Gregg Richter
3755
johnwilliams
  Member Hunts
Lions In My Darkne
Lions In My Darkness

2008 Handgun Blast
2008 Handgun Blastn'Blab Shoots and Competitions

   Access Requires Login

Generated in 0.041 seconds in which 0.009 seconds were spent on a total of 15 queries. Zlib compression enabled.




Copyright © 2000-2008
HandgunHunt.com, Inc.