Page 9 of 13 « First<7891011>Last »
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#101146 - 01/23/12 03:49 PM Re: .460 Rowland [Re: Bearbait in NM]
RioHondoHank
enthusiast


Registered: 11/06/10
Posts: 253
Loc: Oklahoma

Offline
Received my barrel and slide this morning and had my machinist buddy help install 24 lb spring. In order to do it he made a special tool as shown below. We stuffed the stuff shown with the tool into the port to hold the slide in the right position. The very end of the tool was clamped in a vise and the gun pushed against it to compress the spring.



Shot 4 rounds loaded with 9 gr of Longshot and 250 gr XTP set at 1.215 inches OAL. First was at 1135 fps, but the other 3 were 1049 to 1081. Maybe the first may have had a miss weighed load? I checked for any bullet setback after chambering the first round and it was ok.

Shot one round that I had set a little deep, 1.200 inches and it was 1144 fps which I had expected it to be higher.

No signs of any pressure so I think I will go to 9.3 gr and see what happens.

Noticed that Clark sent a new firing pin spring with the kit. I did not install. Is it needed?
_________________________
Hank


Top
#101169 - 01/23/12 06:37 PM Re: .460 Rowland [Re: RioHondoHank]
Russell
old hand


Registered: 10/12/08
Posts: 991
Loc: Oklahoma

Offline
That 'tool' looks handy. I don't know whether the spring is needed or not, but I went ahead and put mine in since it only takes a minute. I like the velocities you're getting with Longshot and the 250's. Thanks for the report.
_________________________
It's not the gun, but the man behind it.

Sheriff Russell Cottle, Ret.
USMC; 1967-1970; Vietnam-'68-'69

Top
#101173 - 01/23/12 06:48 PM Re: .460 Rowland [Re: Russell]
RioHondoHank
enthusiast


Registered: 11/06/10
Posts: 253
Loc: Oklahoma

Offline
Loaded up 4 at 9.3 gr and got 1143, 1171, 1150 and 1151. Used my Hornady powder thrower but checked each load on scale and it was spot on for all 4 loads. Yesterday it was not spot on for some reason. No signs of pressure. Think I will stick with this load for now. Next I will do some target shooting to see how it shoots.

Recoil is very mild by my standards, but I think you know what I am used to.


Edited by RioHondoHank (01/23/12 06:51 PM)
_________________________
Hank


Top
#101239 - 01/24/12 11:00 AM Re: .460 Rowland [Re: RioHondoHank]
Bearbait in NM
enthusiast


Registered: 11/16/10
Posts: 219
Loc: New Mexico

Offline
Hank,

Great news, and things look good. The new firing pin spring is included with all Wolff recoil springs that they sell that are rated above factory. They are "needed" to keep the firing pin from slamming against the primer under the recoil/return of the heavier recoil spring. I never tested to see if it was happening with the stock firing pin spring, I just install them and be done with it. Not a lot of reason not to.

You might find that you do not need the tools to install the Wolff spring now that you have fired it a few times. The spring will take about a half inch of set now, so it should be easier. Your loads mirror mine pretty closely, so hopefully you will find them to be very accuarte. Keep us posted.

As to the bullet setback, it is important to check the first round in the magazine, and at least the last, as these two positions can be different. The same if trying a different brand of magazine, as different brands usually have different followers and lip geometry.

Craig
_________________________
Northern born and Southern bred

Top
#101290 - 01/24/12 03:52 PM Re: .460 Rowland [Re: Bearbait in NM]
RioHondoHank
enthusiast


Registered: 11/06/10
Posts: 253
Loc: Oklahoma

Offline
I changed out the firing pin spring today and shot 4 rounds at a target just to see where the fixed sights are shooting . Shot a little over an inch group, but I was not concentrating, about 3 in low at 20 yds. I can correct for that untiil I get some adjustable sights by putting the 3 dots in a triangle and be pretty close.
_________________________
Hank


Top
#101412 - 01/25/12 09:42 AM Re: .460 Rowland [Re: RioHondoHank]
Bearbait in NM
enthusiast


Registered: 11/16/10
Posts: 219
Loc: New Mexico

Offline
Hank,

I figured you would be happy with the accuracy of the Clark unit. All of mine have been great. If I could only get this Colt barrel to perform the same. I fire lapped it last weekend, and the bore is looking pretty good, but I think it will never be a quality tight group shooter. Perhaps I should just fit a Clark 45 acp barrel to the gun and be done with it. But where's the fun it that.....

Craig
_________________________
Northern born and Southern bred

Top
#101414 - 01/25/12 09:47 AM Re: .460 Rowland [Re: Bearbait in NM]
Russell
old hand


Registered: 10/12/08
Posts: 991
Loc: Oklahoma

Offline
And 'fun' is the real reason most of us 'play'.

Hadn't got to shoot mine, yet. Babysitting sick grandkids takes prioity over grandpa's playing, just ask grandma.
_________________________
It's not the gun, but the man behind it.

Sheriff Russell Cottle, Ret.
USMC; 1967-1970; Vietnam-'68-'69

Top
#101466 - 01/25/12 06:26 PM Re: .460 Rowland [Re: Russell]
RioHondoHank
enthusiast


Registered: 11/06/10
Posts: 253
Loc: Oklahoma

Offline
Tried some Montana Bullet Works 250 gr WFN today set at 1.210 today. First one at 9.3 gr and got about 1230 fps. I then loaded 2 with 9 gr. First one was 1173 fps and I ejected the second one to check for setback. It had a little gouge on the side if the bullet and had moved back about .005. I shot it and it went 1190 fps.

I think that it is going to be hard to WFN bullets to feed without set back. I wonder if not only the shape of the bullet but the bullet lube contributes to the problem.

I have Dave Clements Ruger Old Army 50 Cal cap & Ball conversion and the only way I could get the bullets to stay still under recoil was to wipe as much of the bullet lub as I could off the side of the bullets. I then would load it with wonder wads under the bullet for some extra lube.
_________________________
Hank


Top
#101467 - 01/25/12 06:30 PM Re: .460 Rowland [Re: Russell]
RioHondoHank
enthusiast


Registered: 11/06/10
Posts: 253
Loc: Oklahoma

Offline
 Originally Posted By: 1948ER

Hadn't got to shoot mine, yet.


I really enjoy it now that I live out of the city limits on an acreage so I can test with out having to go to the range.
_________________________
Hank


Top
#101469 - 01/25/12 06:54 PM Re: .460 Rowland [Re: RioHondoHank]
Bearbait in NM
enthusiast


Registered: 11/16/10
Posts: 219
Loc: New Mexico

Offline
Hank,

The WFN's can be hard to feed period. As the nose has to bounce off the feed ramp (if you are lucky just the case side will hit the ramp), then bounce of the top of the chamber, it is a rough ride. Not sure if you have other brands of 1911 mags or someone who could let you test drive a different brand, sometimes a different mag with different feed lip geometry might feed better. Much like Wilson mags have what is loosely called wad cutter lips, they release the cartridge base typically sooner than the traditional Colt feed lips. Not sure I would go out and spend money to test, as it will be a crap shoot. generally Colt style mags are called tapered, and the Wilson and others would be called parallel or wad cutter style, in case you want to ask any buddies for a test drive.

A 250 at 1230 would seem to me to be pretty darn close to max pressure. I would definately be very concerned about setback at that level, as you probably have very little wiggle room.

And when you rub in your home shooting range, proper etiquette requires some amount of tongue protrusion......At least it explains why you can load 4 at a time to test.

Craig
_________________________
Northern born and Southern bred

Top
Page 9 of 13 « First<7891011>Last »


Moderator:  Gregg Richter, Dan B., ClayFHT, Gary 
Hop to:
 Portal Sidebar
 
Need Help?
Login or Register to get access.
  Member Hunts
Backpack Hunting
Backpack Hunting

Texas Safari Handg
Texas Safari Handgun Style

   Access Requires Login
Who's Online
9 registered (Gary, Charlie SA, Oldpaint, Whitworth, Ben S., .41magfan) and 53 anonymous users online.
Top Posters
6253
TCTex.
5708
wapitirod
4704
Tigger
4468
Whitworth
4395
s4s4u
3869
Dan B.
3727
jamesfromjersey
3464
Gary
3419
Ernie
3109
KRal
2984
johnwilliams
2895
pab1
2535
KYODE
1880
Vance in AK.
1783
H2OBUG

Generated in 0.027 seconds in which 0.003 seconds were spent on a total of 13 queries. Zlib compression enabled.




Copyright © 2000-2008
HandgunHunt.com, Inc.