Page 1 of 13 12345>Last »
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#99684 - 01/04/12 06:06 PM .460 Rowland
RioHondoHank
enthusiast


Registered: 11/06/10
Posts: 253
Loc: Oklahoma

Offline
I have an itch and have been considering a 10 mm, but am now thinking I would prefer a 1911 .460 Rowland. Anyone here have any experiance?


Edited by RioHondoHank (01/04/12 06:07 PM)
_________________________
Hank


Top
#99686 - 01/04/12 06:44 PM Re: .460 Rowland [Re: RioHondoHank]
claytonfaulkner
member


Registered: 06/15/11
Posts: 172

Offline
No experence but I want one too!

Would much rather have one in a different platform though, maybe a s&w or sig, not sure how feasible it would be though.

Top
#99689 - 01/04/12 07:01 PM Re: .460 Rowland [Re: claytonfaulkner]
RioHondoHank
enthusiast


Registered: 11/06/10
Posts: 253
Loc: Oklahoma

Offline
 Originally Posted By: claytonfaulkner
No experence but I want one too!

Would much rather have one in a different platform though, maybe a s&w or sig, not sure how feasible it would be though.


Smith & Wesson M&P

http://460rowland.com/smith-wesson-mp-conversion-kit/

Also kit available for Springfield XD
_________________________
Hank


Top
#99695 - 01/04/12 08:44 PM Re: .460 Rowland [Re: RioHondoHank]
claytonfaulkner
member


Registered: 06/15/11
Posts: 172

Offline
I will pass on a tupperware gun in 460, haha.

I would rather have a S&W 4506 or sig p220 (or better yet p220 super match). If I even come across either for a good price I might grab it, send it to magnaport, get some heavies springs, and have the barrel re chambered.

Top
#99697 - 01/04/12 09:04 PM Re: .460 Rowland [Re: claytonfaulkner]
Gary Administrator
Shooting Expert


Registered: 12/16/03
Posts: 3464
Loc: Austin, TX USA

content Online
Wilson Combat makes one if you don't like tupperware guns.
_________________________
America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the bastards.

Top
#99699 - 01/04/12 09:19 PM Re: .460 Rowland [Re: Gary]
jwp475
addict


Registered: 01/18/09
Posts: 529

Offline


My 1911 shoots 45 ACP and 45 Super. I shoot 255 gran hard cast 45 Super at 1090 FPS, they'll leave a mark

Top
#99700 - 01/04/12 09:21 PM Re: .460 Rowland [Re: Gary]
claytonfaulkner
member


Registered: 06/15/11
Posts: 172

Offline
Oh no problem with tuberware guns, just don't want one in 460.

I would rather have the smith or the sig. I just looked at the Wilson Combat, looks nice but 4k is waay too much. I guess I should look at the conversion kits out there for 1911's.

Top
#99734 - 01/05/12 07:51 PM Re: .460 Rowland [Re: claytonfaulkner]
doc with a glock
addict


Registered: 06/05/08
Posts: 569
Loc: Montana, USA

Offline
I have a limited edition Dan Wesson revolver, stainless, 5" heavy barrel, with a titanium nitride finished cylinder. One shroud has an EGW picatinny mount, the other is a plain stainless heavy. I also have a Wilson conversion for the 1911. I don't have one for a Tupperware gun; however. It is a decent caliber, pretty much identical to my 45 Win Mags.

Doc

Top
#99773 - 01/06/12 06:39 PM Re: .460 Rowland [Re: doc with a glock]
Bearbait in NM
enthusiast


Registered: 11/16/10
Posts: 219
Loc: New Mexico

Offline
I have had many conversions (Clark) in 460 that I have played with over the years. My latest is on a Colt Series 70 SS Reissue, and I do love the performance. I have not taken a critter with mine to date, but I started playing with 250 grain bullets last spring/summer, and hope to have suitable loads worked up for this year.

I am assuming that you are thinking about big game hunting with it, and as such it is a little tricker than big bore revolvers. Meaning that to get into reasonable hunting bullets, you almost have to look to non-acp made bullets. The .452 diameter stuff works great, but you really have to pay attention to your reloading techniques, and the way the gun is set up if doing a conversion. You do not want to have feeding problems that would cause bullet setback. And you may find that many of the wider meplate stuff may not funtion/chamber well. Like other wildcats that push the velocity of tradtional for that caliber bullets, you have to be a little creative in bullet selection.

I would also add that the power is definately there, and for me I shoot my Rowland more consitently across the boards than I do loading my 454 to similar power levels. Whereas SA's are pretty picky about shooting technique, a ramped up 1911 is much less so, for me. The comp on the Clark Conversion works amazingly well, and the lack of muzzle rise is pretty astonishing.

On the 1911, the conversion really pushes the gun design to the outter limits, as such you really need to pay attention to how your gun is set up, and especially to your reloading practices/techniques.

Craig
_________________________
Northern born and Southern bred

Top
#99777 - 01/06/12 08:31 PM Re: .460 Rowland [Re: Bearbait in NM]
RioHondoHank
enthusiast


Registered: 11/06/10
Posts: 253
Loc: Oklahoma

Offline
I talked to Double Tap today about the 255 gr Keith style bullet that they use in one of their .45 ACP loadings. I figured it would feed well.



Unfortunately it does not have a gas check and I prefer gas checks for hotter loads to prevent leading. Perhaps I can find a Keith style bullet with a gas check for .45 Colt somewhere.
_________________________
Hank


Top
Page 1 of 13 12345>Last »


Moderator:  Gregg Richter, Dan B., ClayFHT, Gary 
Hop to:
 Portal Sidebar
 
Need Help?
Login or Register to get access.
  Member Hunts
Most Challenging S
Most Challenging Sport?

My first Monster R
My first Monster Ram

   Access Requires Login
Who's Online
10 registered (Gary, wapitirod, bfr4570, Whitworth, sixshot, tyler.woodard04) and 33 anonymous users online.
Top Posters
6253
TCTex.
5708
wapitirod
4704
Tigger
4468
Whitworth
4395
s4s4u
3869
Dan B.
3727
jamesfromjersey
3464
Gary
3419
Ernie
3109
KRal
2984
johnwilliams
2895
pab1
2535
KYODE
1880
Vance in AK.
1783
H2OBUG

Generated in 0.023 seconds in which 0.002 seconds were spent on a total of 15 queries. Zlib compression enabled.




Copyright © 2000-2008
HandgunHunt.com, Inc.