Page 1 of 2 12>
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#186376 - 11/15/17 08:23 PM 45 LC vs 454 Casull
Hendog
stranger


Registered: 06/15/17
Posts: 14
Loc: Washington

Offline
I been working on loads for my Ruger SRH. The first is 454 Casull 300xtp w/H110 at 1650fps. Very accurate but, kicks like a mule. Second is 45LC 250RNFP Oregon Trails at 1100fps. Not as accurate but, very tame recoil. Is load #2 enough for deer/pig?

Top
#186377 - 11/15/17 08:40 PM Re: 45 LC vs 454 Casull [Re: Hendog]
KRal
Distinguished Master


Registered: 04/06/05
Posts: 5959
Loc: MS

Offline
A 250gr bullet at 1100 fps is plenty for deer. I'm not familiar with that particular bullet and don't know exactly what that nose profile looks like, but the round nose part makes me wonder if that's a good hunting bullet. A WFN would work and I've also had good results with a 250 xtp.
_________________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown and 17 to smile, but only 3 for proper trigger squeeze.

Top
#186378 - 11/15/17 08:59 PM Re: 45 LC vs 454 Casull [Re: KRal]
Hendog
stranger


Registered: 06/15/17
Posts: 14
Loc: Washington

Offline
RNFP=Round Nose Flat Point

Top
#186380 - 11/15/17 09:44 PM Re: 45 LC vs 454 Casull [Re: Hendog]
KRal
Distinguished Master


Registered: 04/06/05
Posts: 5959
Loc: MS

Offline
 Originally Posted By: Hendog
RNFP=Round Nose Flat Point


What I was meaning: I don't know how "round nosed" it is or how flat the point is. If it doesn't have a wide meplat, it will not make for a good hunting bullet.
_________________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown and 17 to smile, but only 3 for proper trigger squeeze.

Top
#186381 - 11/15/17 09:53 PM Re: 45 LC vs 454 Casull [Re: KRal]
KRal
Distinguished Master


Registered: 04/06/05
Posts: 5959
Loc: MS

Offline
Ok...I just looked up that bullet and I personally wouldn't use it for hunting. I think a semi-wadcutter/Keith style or a WFN would be a better choice if you choose cast.
_________________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown and 17 to smile, but only 3 for proper trigger squeeze.

Top
#186384 - 11/16/17 12:17 AM Re: 45 LC vs 454 Casull [Re: KRal]
tradmark
Pooh-Bah


Registered: 06/08/10
Posts: 2257

content Online
I agree. A good speer, barnes, or swift run hard is dynamite on nearly everything. The best expandable i know for
Moderate 454 loads is the sierra 300, but i agree i nice 250-300gr wfn run 1000-1300 fps are deadly on deer and is a midly recoiling round. Its a good bet.

Top
#186392 - 11/16/17 08:11 AM Re: 45 LC vs 454 Casull [Re: tradmark]
45MAN
enthusiast


Registered: 08/13/17
Posts: 290
Loc: brownsville, texas

Offline
THE 250 OTBC RNFP BULLET IS SIMILAR TO THE ORIGINAL COWBOY BULLETS, WHICH ACCOUNTED FOR WAGON LOADS OF MEN AND GAME. SOME OLD TIMERS IN KENYA USED TO HUNT LIONS ON HORSEBACK WITH THEIR COLT SAA 45 COLTS. I HAVE KILLED 4 WT BUCKS AND 1 FALLOW BUCK WITH THOSE BULLETS IN MY OUTDOORSMAN LOADS @ AROUND 1,350 fps. I HAVE ALSO KILLED A MEDIUM AOUDAD WITH THE SAME BULLET BUT IN AN OLD WEST LOAD @ AROUND 900 fps. ALMOST 100% OF MY 45 COLT SHOOTING IS NOW WITH THIS BULLET IN OLD WEST OR OUTDOORSMAN LOADS. THIS SEASON MY GOAL IS TO TAKE A WT BUCK WITH MY RECENT "GUN SHOW" ACQUIRED RUGER BOWEN PERFECTED BISLEY WITH THE OLD WEST LOAD. WFN TYPE BULLETS SHOULD BE A BETTER CHOICE FOR HUNTING BUT SO FAR I HAVE DONE OK WITH THE 250 RNFP.
_________________________
"ADAPT OR DIE". I USE ALL CAPS, NOT BECAUSE I AM YELLING, BUT BECAUSE IT IS AN OLD HABIT FROM MY ARMY DAYS, PLUS IT IS EASIER TO TYPE AND READ.

Top
#186396 - 11/16/17 11:21 AM Re: 45 LC vs 454 Casull [Re: Hendog]
ter548
stranger


Registered: 01/18/14
Posts: 10

Offline
Anybody ever try the 270 gr. thunderheads for deer? Have some loaded at 1140fps (45 colt) for my redhawk. Really want to see how they work. Hope to get one with the 45 colt and with my blackhawk 44 special using the keith load.

Top
#186398 - 11/16/17 11:36 AM Re: 45 LC vs 454 Casull [Re: KRal]
s4s4u
Shootist


Registered: 01/18/04
Posts: 9363
Loc: Northern MN

content Online
 Originally Posted By: KRal
Ok...I just looked up that bullet and I personally wouldn't use it for hunting. I think a semi-wadcutter/Keith style or a WFN would be a better choice if you choose cast.


I agree. RNFP not a good hunting bullet.
_________________________
Rod, too.

Short cuts often lead to long recoveries.

Top
#186410 - 11/16/17 08:21 PM Re: 45 LC vs 454 Casull [Re: s4s4u]
500WE
Pooh-Bah


Registered: 02/12/07
Posts: 1607
Loc: North Carolina

Offline
You guys should read 45 Man's post. Rey ain't no amateur.

Top
Page 1 of 2 12>


Moderator:  jamesfromjersey, Gregg Richter, Dan B., ClayFHT, Gary 
Hop to:
 Portal Sidebar
Who's Online
16 registered (Mech 8, s4s4u, Dino, tradmark, karl, Muddy) and 71 anonymous users online.
Top Posters
9363
s4s4u
9068
Whitworth
7868
jamesfromjersey
7641
wapitirod
7327
TCTex.
5959
KRal
5014
Gary
4855
Ernie
4704
Tigger
4370
Dan B.
4081
pab1
3892
TN Lone Wolf
3755
johnwilliams
3745
Gregg Richter
3442
Franchise
  Member Hunts
The Missouri Expad
The Missouri Expadition

Ice age tusker
Ice age tusker

   Access Requires Login

Generated in 0.03 seconds in which 0.003 seconds were spent on a total of 14 queries. Zlib compression enabled.




Copyright © 2000-2008
HandgunHunt.com, Inc.