Page 1 of 6 12345>Last »
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#180115 - 04/09/17 03:28 PM Fast 357 versus a slow 44?
s4s4u
Shootist


Registered: 01/18/04
Posts: 9071
Loc: Northern MN

Offline
Word is Lipsey has commissioned a run of Ruger GP-100's in 44 Special with a 5" barrel which got me wondering if I "need" one. I already own a GeeP in 357 with a 6" tube. What say you, if you had the choice between the two for 50ish+ yard deer would you prefer a fast 357 or a slow 44?
_________________________
Rod, too.

Short cuts often lead to long recoveries.

Top
#180117 - 04/09/17 04:34 PM Re: Fast 357 versus a slow 44? [Re: s4s4u]
AK hgunner1
addict


Registered: 01/11/17
Posts: 401
Loc: 49th. State

Offline
s4s4u,
You know me....It would be a .357
_________________________
Charlie

Matthew 5:9
Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called the sons of GOD

Top
#180118 - 04/09/17 06:44 PM Re: Fast 357 versus a slow 44? [Re: AK hgunner1]
SGalan
journeyman


Registered: 09/03/16
Posts: 55

Offline
I could've done without knowing Lipsey's is having some 5" .44 Special made in the GP platform. Guess it's time to convince the wife I NEED one more.

Top
#180119 - 04/09/17 06:58 PM Re: Fast 357 versus a slow 44? [Re: SGalan]
ruger4570
member


Registered: 09/09/16
Posts: 122
Loc: Illinois

Offline
Yep, 5" blued.

Top
#180120 - 04/09/17 07:29 PM Re: Fast 357 versus a slow 44? [Re: ruger4570]
SGalan
journeyman


Registered: 09/03/16
Posts: 55

Offline
Where can these 5" .44 special revolvers be procured pray tell?

Top
#180121 - 04/09/17 08:28 PM Re: Fast 357 versus a slow 44? [Re: SGalan]
Raptortrapper
Shooting Expert


Registered: 03/31/09
Posts: 3342
Loc: Colorado

Offline
I'd go 44. Since using hardcast, I've learned heavy and slow is better than light and fast. Well, at least for me and my situations / critters.
_________________________
If you don't carry in condition 1, you don't carry a gun, you carry a bullet holder.

Top
#180122 - 04/09/17 08:36 PM Re: Fast 357 versus a slow 44? [Re: Raptortrapper]
karl
enthusiast


Registered: 01/12/15
Posts: 354
Loc: Minnesota

content Online
Obviously, "both" is the correct answer here. How else could you conduct a proper comparison.

Top
#180123 - 04/09/17 09:31 PM Re: Fast 357 versus a slow 44? [Re: karl]
junebug
Pooh-Bah


Registered: 10/26/09
Posts: 1883
Loc: Bardstown ,Ky

Offline
The 44 starts out at what the 357 ends up at. SOOOOOOO bigger is always better if recoil is not an issue.
BUY!BUY! BUY!
_________________________
junebug

Top
#180124 - 04/09/17 09:37 PM Re: Fast 357 versus a slow 44? [Re: karl]
Ernie
Distinguished Expert


Registered: 01/18/04
Posts: 4654
Loc: Gillette, Wyoming

Offline
If it is deer sized game, 357 is so easy to shoot and kill stuff with....
Karl does have a good solution though
\:\)
_________________________
Ernie

Top
#180125 - 04/09/17 10:20 PM Re: Fast 357 versus a slow 44? [Re: Ernie]
cherokeetracker
member


Registered: 11/27/15
Posts: 156

Offline
Hmmm a matching pair in 357 and 44,, since both are easy to shoot, and fun too. I lean towards the 44 SPL but have used the 357 many times.

Top
Page 1 of 6 12345>Last »


Moderator:  Gary, jamesfromjersey, Dan B., ClayFHT, Gregg Richter 
Hop to:
 Portal Sidebar
Who's Online
3 registered (Mo_long_tom, Whitworth, karl) and 138 anonymous users online.
Top Posters
9071
s4s4u
8870
Whitworth
7641
wapitirod
7388
jamesfromjersey
7327
TCTex.
5810
KRal
4989
Gary
4704
Tigger
4654
Ernie
4370
Dan B.
3822
pab1
3755
johnwilliams
3694
Gregg Richter
3639
TN Lone Wolf
3342
Raptortrapper
  Member Hunts
Till Case Do Us Pa
Till Case Do Us Part

A good start in Mi
A good start in Missouri

   Access Requires Login

Generated in 0.038 seconds in which 0.008 seconds were spent on a total of 14 queries. Zlib compression enabled.




Copyright © 2000-2008
HandgunHunt.com, Inc.